/ Home
/ SUBMISSION

/ The BJNANO
/ Diamond Open Access
/ Journal Statistics
/ Editorial Board
/ Community
/ Call for papers

/ Latest Articles
/ Most accessed
/ Thematic issues
/ Volumes
/ Authors

/ Alerts

/ TWITTER
/ LINKEDIN
/ Mastodon
/ RSS FEED

Empty search

Article Type

Publication Date Range

Search Tips

This search combines search strings from the content search (i.e. "Full Text", "Author", "Title", "Abstract", or "Keywords") with "Article Type" and "Publication Date Range" using the AND operator.

Search Examples

aromatic	the word “aromatic”
aromatic aldehyde	the word “aromatic” OR “aldehyde”
+aromatic +aldehyde	both words “aromatic” AND “aldehyde”
+aromatic -aldehyde	the word “aromatic” but NOT “aldehyde”
“aromatic aldehyde”	the exact phrase “aromatic aldehyde”
benz*	words which begin with “benz”, such as “benzene” or “benzyl”
benz*yl	words that begin with “benz” and end with “yl”, such as “benzyl” or “benzoyl”
benzyl~	words that are close to the word “benzyl”, such as “benzoyl” (i.e., fuzzy search)

BROWSE
Latest Articles
Most accessed
thematic issues
volumes
authors

BROWSE

Latest Articles Most Accessed Thematic Issues Volumes Authors

Author

2 article(s) from Cacciola, Matteo

Influence of the magnetic nanoparticle coating on the magnetic relaxation time

Mihaela Osaci and
Matteo Cacciola

Beilstein J. Nanotechnol. 2020, 11, 1207–1216, doi:10.3762/bjnano.11.105

PDF

Figure 1: Positions of nanoparticles inside the test cube: a) initial moment; b) after 0.1 ms (thickness of t...

Jump to Figure 1

Figure 2: Positions of nanoparticles inside the test cube: a) initial moment; b) after 0.1 ms (thickness of t...

Jump to Figure 2

Figure 3: Average values of the effective magnetic relaxation time versus thickness of the nanoparticle coati...

Jump to Figure 3

Figure 4: Average values of the effective magnetic relaxation time versus thickness of the nanoparticle coati...

Jump to Figure 4

Figure 5: Average values of the effective magnetic relaxation time versus polymer surface density at differen...

Jump to Figure 5

Album

Full Research Paper

Published 12 Aug 2020

Full text

An adapted Coffey model for studying susceptibility losses in interacting magnetic nanoparticles

Mihaela Osaci and
Matteo Cacciola

Beilstein J. Nanotechnol. 2015, 6, 2173–2182, doi:10.3762/bjnano.6.223

PDF

Figure 1: (a) Néel relaxation time and (b) effective relaxation time vs volume fraction of nanoparticles with...

Jump to Figure 1

Figure 2: (a) Néel relaxation time and (b) effective relaxation time vs volume fraction of nanoparticles with...

Jump to Figure 2

Figure 3: SLP vs volume fraction of nanoparticles: (a) diameter 7 nm, (b) diameter 17 nm.

Jump to Figure 3

Figure 4: SLP vs local volume fraction in clusters of nanoparticles: (a) diameter 7 nm, (b) diameter 17 nm.

Jump to Figure 4

Figure 5: (a) Average magnetic field and (b) average normalized energy barriers vs volume fraction for nanopa...

Jump to Figure 5

Figure 6: SLP vs diameter of the nanoparticles.

Jump to Figure 6

Album

Full Research Paper

Published 19 Nov 2015

Full text

Other Beilstein-Institut Open Science Activities

/ Help / Support & Contact / Alerts / Privacy Policy / Terms & Conditions / Impressum